This month the U.S. and European Union launched the Global Methane Pledge at the United Nations Climate Change conference, in recognition of the chance countries have to slow climate change by tackling methane emissions–possibly even before the end of this decade. Countries joining the pledge commit to a collective goal of reducing global methane emissions by at least 30% from 2020 levels before 2030 with a particular focus on sources of high emissions.
Since 2019 Biraud and team have been setting up a framework for pinpointing and monitoring these “super emitters” in California’s Southern San Joaquin Valley where more than 50% of methane emissions can be traced back to less than 10% of super emitters from the dairy and oil and gas industries. Their goal is to identify the super emitters at the scale of individual oil wells, fields, or entire regions, quantify the amount of methane emitted, then use that information to help inform mitigation approaches across California and elsewhere.
Q. Why monitor methane? Why is it important to identify methane super-emitters?
Methane is emitted during energy production, raising livestock, and the decay of organic waste in landfills. Methane is what we call a “short-lived” climate forcer because it stays in the atmosphere for far less time than other greenhouse gasses such as carbon dioxide – 10 years versus more than 100 years for CO2. The molecular structure of methane is such that it is capable of warming the atmosphere about 80 times as fast as carbon dioxide. That’s bad news for warming as there’s evidence that methane could cause more warming over the next 10 years than CO2.
Although this is clearly a challenge, this also presents a great opportunity to act: by reducing methane emissions, we can reduce methane induced-warming and slow down the rate of warming. If we do this right, there’s potential to see results from cuts to methane emissions in as little as 10 years.
And that’s where super-emitters come in. Multiple atmospheric studies have identified that methane emissions have been significantly underestimated by greenhouse gas inventories for the U.S., California, and select cities. Other studies have provided compelling evidence indicating that in California a relatively small number of super-emitters – in some cases 1 to 10% of potential sources – contribute more than half of the methane emissions. We can’t make the reductions needed without addressing these super emitters.
Q. Recent research identified a large methane hotspot over California’s Central Valley. Why is it important to address this, and how is California working to do so?
Analysis of remote sensing data has identified that this hotspot, located in the California Central Valley, is likely to be the second largest hotspot over the entire U.S. This hotspot is associated with emissions from both the agriculture and energy sectors. Methane emissions from the energy sector are from leaks occurring during the extraction and distribution of natural gas, which present the cheapest opportunity to reduce methane emissions.
The state of California introduced Assembly Bill 1496 (AB1496) in 2015 to address this and requires the California Air Resources Board to target these high-emissions methane hotspots through monitoring and observation. Our ability to detect and mitigate these hotspots have rapidly advanced in recent years through the availability of new technologies. These include low-cost sensors, hand-held devices, mobile survey vehicles, and sophisticated sensors set up on communication towers, drones, aircrafts, and satellites.